Recent Posts
- 04/21 Updated NRC data, rankings site outage
- 02/12 Big cuts for science?
- 02/10 Debunking Discrimination
- 02/08 Science & Baseball
- 01/24 Test, test, test
- 01/22 "The PhD student is...
- 01/21 Taxing times?
- 01/10 "The mathematics of narcissism"
- 12/28 Professional Science
- 12/20 "The Disposable Academic"
- 12/16 Students know effective teaching when they see it
- 12/09 Science funding: an alternative approach
- 12/02 NSF in the crosshairs
- 12/01 Gender differences in science: a cure?
- 11/23 Leaving academia
Categories
Funding
Fiscal Sponsor
The requirement hasn't been enacted into law yet (and I'm not sure it will be). However, requiring a statement about mentorship in the proposal and in the annual reports does a couple of things: (1) it forces the PI to at least pay lip service to the idea of mentorship, and (2) it sets up at least the distant prospect of enforcement. I can't imagine that anything ever would be enforced, but still. The idea of defining what an undergraduate education should involve has universities all nervous about academic malpractice - I could see this kind of requirement creating the same kinds of concerns.
If this were to go through, I would guess that it would create a demand that the university level for postdoc offices to provide basic professional development services to cover institutions' backsides, and that would be a good thing.